Joint Forum of
Executives of MTNL
Central
Headquarters, New Delhi
No.- JF/MTNL/CO/GMHR/2009/
Dated at ND the 28-04-2009
To
General Manager (HR) ,
Corporate Office, MTNL,
Jeevan Bharati Bldg.,ND.
Sub:- Regarding ongoing
Agitational Program of Executives’ of MTNL
Delhi/Mumbai.
Ref No:- MTNL/CO/IRW/21(90)/2009/65
Dated 27th April,2009
Respected Sir,
Kindly refer to your letter No. MTNL/CO/IRW/21(90)/209/65
dated 25/04/2009,in reference to our letter No.JF/MTNL/CO/2009
Dated 16/4/2009, we would like to submit the
following for your kind consideration and
intervention-
Kindly recall the assurances given to
us that a committee will be constituted of
management as well as executives associations
representatives to find out the ways and means to
implement the revised wages for executives in MTNL
with 30% fitment along with HRA and other
recommendations, regarding perks and allowances
,but that committee has not been constituted till
date. We are constrained to draw your attention
that MTNL management in a very arbitrary manner had
sent the proposal of revised wages for executives
of MTNL with 5 % fitment and capping of HRA as on
December 2006. In the letter under reference, ‘
para 4 of DPE OM No. 2(70)/08-DPE(WC)-GL-VIII/09
Dated 02/04/2009’ says.
“ Para 4
-- The ceilings mentioned under various items
given in OMs Dated 26-11-2008 , 09-02-2009 and this
OM are the maximum permissible limits. However ,
lower limits against these maximum permissible
limits can be provided in the presidential
directives, depending upon affordability, capacity
to pay and sustainability of the concerned CPSE.”
The
management has misquoted and misconstrued the para
as the quoted para above is in reference to PRP
which is the only item that contains “Lower Limits
and Higher Limits “
Whereas sustainability and profitability is well
defined in the DPE order no.
2(70)/08-DPE(WC)-GL-XVI/08 Dated 26/11/2008, para 3
and para 4 states as under;-
“Para 3 –
Affordability for implementation of Pay revision—The
revised pay scales would be adopted, subject to the
condition that the additional outgo by such
revision for a period of 12 months should not
result in more than 20 % dip in profit before tax (PBT)
for the year 2007-2008 of a CPSE in respect of
executives as well as non unionised supervisory
staff taken together in a CPSE. CPSEs that can not
afford to pay full package, can implement with
either part PRP or no PRP. These CPSEs may pay the
full package subsequently, provided the dip in the
profit (PBT) is fully recouped to the original
level.”
“Para 4 -- The
CPSEs ,which are not able to adopt revised pay
scales (2007), may give an increase on the basic
pay plus DA drawn in the pre revised scale as on
1-1-2007, with a uniform lower fitment of 10 % or
20%, depending upon their affordability, with the
approval of their ministry/department.”
Hence it is very clear from the DPE orders, that
the parameters for the affordability, capacity to
pay and sustainability of the concerned CPSE is
taken on the basis of the balance sheet of the
concerned CPSE before PBT for the year 2007-08,as
it has been categorically mentioned in para 3 OM
Dated 26/11/2008, It is worth to mention here that
in MTNL, PBT for the year 2007-08 is Rs.641 Crores
and the permissible 20 % amounts to Rs 128.2
Crores ,while in case of implementing new wages for
executives of MTNL the expenditure will be Rs. 46
Crores, which is less than 8 % of PBT. It may
kindly be noted that there is no non unionized
supervisory cadre in MTNL.
In
Para 4 of DPE OM Dated 26/11/2008 ,it has been
mentioned that the CPSEs ,which are not able to
adopt revised pay scales (2007), may give an
increase on the basic pay plus DA drawn in the pre
revised scale as on 1-1-2007, with a uniform lower
fitment of 10 % or 20%, depending upon their
affordability, with the approval of their
ministry/department. But this para is not
applicable for us as the MTNL balance sheet for the
year 2007-08 ,before PBT is a strong indicator that
MTNL is in a position to afford and in a capacity
to implement, the new wage revision for the
executives with 30 % fitment moreover, MTNL has
already adopted the revised pay scales. To
establish the affordability , capacity to pay and
sustainability of any CPSE, the balance sheet is
only and only indicator. Hence the MTNL’s balance
sheet 2007-08 is meeting all the requirements of
DPE’s OM Dated 26/11/2008, 9/2/2009 and 2/4/2009.
Hence the reasons given in the letter under
reference for not implementing the revised pay
scales with 30 % are far from truth and also not
sustainable and tenable .
As
far as the sincere efforts of the management to
resolve the issue are concerned, following facts
are being brought for your consideration. As you
have mentioned that management intervened in the
matter and invited the representatives of the Joint
Forum of Executives of MTNL to apprise the
financial position of MTNL ,if you recall the whole
discussion, you will find that in the discussion
management only apprised us of the financial
position which was contradicted by the
representatives and suggested to implement 30 %
fitment as the MTNL balance sheet of 2007-08
fulfils all the parameters laid down by the DPE in
their OM of dated 26/11/2008 and then form a
committee to work out the ways to earn more revenue
and profit, for which many suggestions were given
.Finally it was decided that whole matter will be
discussed with CMD MTNL as and when he returns from
foreign tour but unfortunately no initiative was
taken from the management side in this regard to
resolve this issue. So it is not fair to tell that
“the matter was under discussion and the
Association went ahead with their agitation” .
In
the light of above facts, we once again request the
management to leave the way of confrontation in the
larger interest of company and arrange an immediate
meeting with the association representatives so as
to start the dialogue and the issues could be
resolved across the table amicably to avoid further
escalation of the industrial unrest. We are peace
loving people and very much concerned about MTNL
organization and services to our valued customers.
Awaiting for a positive response at the earliest.
With Regards.
Yours truly,
A K
KAUSHIK
V K TOMAR
GS
TEAM
GS MEA
Copy to:
-
P.S. to Hon’ble MOC & IT
-
P.S. to Hon’ble MOS C & IT
-
Secretary DoT, Sanchar Bhawan , ND
-
CMD,MTNL ND
-
Dir(HR) MTNL CO, ND
-
Dir(Fin) MTNL CO, ND
-
Dir(Tech) MTNL CO, ND
-
Executive Director, MTNL Delhi/Mumbai
-
Joint Secretary (T), DoT.
|